The next part of the presentation was the pros of astrology which was presented by Michel. He started off by explaining what horoscope was and that how it was a major part of astrology. He supported his argument by the use of various examples which include the example of change in generation, images of Mayans astrology and example of solar eclipse in 1999. Therefore, the rhetorical device that had been utilize is the argument from example. The argument from authority was another rhetoric utilise when he talks about the astrologers.
Alan, then presented with the cons of astrology. His claims involved examples of himself. He supported his claims on the basis of his personal belief.
He current the evidence that supported his beliefs and rejected the evidence that contradicted them. The rhetoric devices use here are the confirmation bias and the personal organisation or the subjective validation. He ended the presentation with an example of the use of the placebo effect.
I thought that they had pretty strong argument because it made me change my views about astrology. The arguments were pretty convincing. Although if there would shoot been more examples presented it would have been probably more convincing. The presentation style was in more of a basic way with pictures and a small bit of data present in them.If you insufficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.