Comparative Analysis:Theories of Knowledge by Plato and Aristotle

In the latter, those in the undermine who view the world only through the senses are confine in what Plato (2008, p. 101) calls the "realm of the visible." Those who do so are locked in an intellectual prison. Those who see the " evident" world do so through ration, similarly to Aristotle's argument that friendship comes via ration (Plato, 2008, p. 101). It is the intelligible realm, that "produces and controls truth and intelligence" that provides true knowledge (Plato, 2008, p. 101). Aristotle argued there is no realm apart from human ration that offers such widely distributed truths.

Aristotle did not believe, resembling Plato, that ideal ideas existed independently of the human sense but were rather products of human reason. In On the Soul, Aristotle reveals that he does not believe the soul exists past the physical beingness or substance. Aristotle (2008, Book III) believes that animal souls have two characteristics, "(a) the susceptibility of discrimination which is the work of thought and sense, and

Aristotle. (1958). The pocket Aristotle. New York: Washington Square Books.

Plato's Divide landmark theory also reveals his theory of knowledge, with different levels of knowledge like Eikasia or the lowest level of awareness which is the inability to actualize reality from appearances like those in the Myth of the Cave who contract on the shadow "puppets" (Plato, 2008, p. 101). The lower part of the line is opinion, which is comprised of an swiftness portion known as intuitive feeling or Pistis (Plato, 360 B.C.E.). Episteme is knowledge and only thinking or Dianola leads to wisdom (Plato, 360 B.C.E.). In Theaetetus Socrates rejects sealed kinds of knowledge, arguing that the final form of knowledge is true belief that has been "given account of," meaning it has been defined or explained in some rational manner (Plato, 360 B.C.E.).

b) the faculty of originating local movement." In this sense, the body is not the prison-like housing for the soul that Plato views it as. As Aristotle (1958, p. 327) argues in another work, choice for humans stems from the power of reason to get by between "alternative action
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.