The Death Penalty is An "Inhuman and Cruel Punishment

The Argument frequently is whether the dying penalty is moralistic penance or legal homicide.

It is the moral theory that propels some anti- destruction penalty activists: "Supporters of capital punishment argon inconsistent because their principles can be used to demand the colonisation of any individuals they deem socially useless. Human behavior is ne'er justifiably the object of manipulation. There is no rational argument for the death penalty, only badly rationalized emotions. Man's freedom is only deep down imprecisely defined limits, so that when he downs, society constantly shares in his guilt" (Svitak 556).

remnant Penalty opponents sum up their arguments in many ways- but they all end up with one thing: The Death penalty is wrong. "To many slew this trend toward more executions is a step backward. Death penalty opponents passionately argue that the death penalty is wrong for a number of reasons. The death penalty is morally wrong. Many death penalty opponents believe that by legalizing executions, society puts itself on the same(p) low level as those it executes, and may nonetheless ontogenesis violence in society by making it more acceptable" (Anon 1).

An argument in California involved a former gang member who killed a number of people, was sentenced to death, and " meliorate" in prison writing a number of books against gangs. onwards "Tookie" Williams was executed, the Los Angeles TIMES editorial protested the death penalty in cosmopolitan: "The reason to oppose capit

Bottum, Joseph: "Christians and the Death Penalty" New York: First Things, Aug/Sept. 2005

For justice to prevail, perhaps the middle-aged Biblical "eye for an eye" threat is not improper, even in the 21st century. "A lost human bearing can only be fully compensated through and through the death penalty.

As long as this does not authorise there will be, in a symbolic way, the plow of blood from the ground with the message that the crime has not been atoned. close to of us understand and feel that there is a debt that has to be paid in a just way." (Anderson 7).

Sarat, Austin: "PRESENTIST PREOCCUPATIONS: REFLECTIONS ON STATE KILLING IN THE CONTEMPORARY UNITED STATES" historical Reflections 2003

No author listed: "The death penalty" Current Events, a Weekly Reader publication, April 3, 1995 v94 n23

Supporters of the death penalty just don't grease one's palms these arguments. To them the death penalty is neither immoral nor cruel nor unusual. "The death penalty is morally right, not wrong. Death penalty supporters range that society has the moral right - and duty - to take the lives of those who kill others. Many point to the Bible, which calls for punishment in the form of life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand . . The death penalty is not unconstitutional. Death penalty supporters also strongly dispute the contract that the death penalty is unconstitutional. They point out that the framers of the Constitution specifically refused to prohibit capital punishment in the Constitution and e
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.