The Kennewick Man Controversy

Coleman and Dysart (5) point out that "Journalists continue science as though it were devoid of values, often glide path cultural views as though they were devoid of reason and apply news frames that mirror such views." Furthermore, in a pluralist society, on that point is a "complex of groups and interests," of which none predominate all the time, so the effect of journalism bay window be to champion a particular cause to the detriment of others (Coleman & Dysart 6). In the Kennewick Man case, discordant journalists argued each side-the Native American and the scientific. The national government's Army corps of Engineers held jurisdiction over the discovery site and made a seizure of the remains to comply with the Native American sculpt Protection and Repatriation Act, or NAGPRA, a law that stipulates that all world remains or funerary/sacred relics held by a federally funded agency or found on federal land associated with a Native American tribe can request return of the remains and relics (Coleman & Dysart 10). Although the Army corps of Engineers confiscated the finger cymbals and originally announced that it would return them to an alliance of five northwest Indian tribes represented by the Umatilla, they ended up attribute them for several years (Thomas & Colley xxii). Scientists were outraged, championshiping that if the skeleton had Caucasoid traits, the Indians could not claim it (Thomas & Colley xxii). This prompted a lawsuit, Bonnischsen et a

l. v. United States of America, endeavour to obtain access to the finger cymbals for archaeologists and other scientists (Thomas & Colley xxiv). In the meantime, the Umatilla leader, Armand Minthorn argued that the bones should be returned to the Native Americans.

"Our oral history goes back 10,000 years," he said, "We know how time began and how Indian people were created. They can guess whatever they want, the scientists. They are being disrespectful" (Thomas & Colley xxii).

The issues raised by the debate include a question of where the limits of scientific exploration should lie and how ethical issues should fare in any competitiveness of science and ethics. This debate is still not resolved, as prove by its continuation in other forms, such as stem cell research arguments. The right of science, unfortunately, is often held higher(prenominal) than the right of ethics, which results in acceptance of unconscionable acts in the discern of science, such as experimentation on Jews in national socialist concentration camps. Could the issue have been handled better? Undoubtedly. If the Army Corps of Engineers had turned the bones over to the courts prior to making any promises, the battle could at least have taken menage in a
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.