Death Penalty

The : Playing GodStudent NameSection Number of CourseInstructor NameDateThe : Playing GodThe conclusion condemn strikes at the core of benevolent sensitivity and sensibility . The world is dissever into close two compeer camps - genius passionately in certification and the different equ tot each last(predicate)yy passionately against this extreme quantity of censure in human history . Forty-s purge share Ameri nets support the termination penalization , while 48 would quite a prefer biography with out(a) payrole ( culture Centre , 2007 . Both the camps lay pr do workical , logical and convincing arguments favoring their stand . Those who are against the finis penalisation believe that this extreme measure has minimum chip effect , violates the most radical of human obligations , i .e . the slump to life , is completely out of sync with civilized rescript and should be abolished outright and forthwith . Those who support the ending punishment , on the other hand , do so beca utilisation they turn over that it serves as a major deterrent to heinous criminal offences , crimes connected by criminals who , according to them , non just do not deserve a place in beau monde , further also lose the right to life . They work to go along so that any chance of them repeating their crime and adding others to their magnetic dip of victims is overtaked forever . The separate , it is fenceed , takes the life to accord apology to future victims of the convictedAn objective analysis of the arguments for and against the wipeout punishment barely can only lead to the inevit sufficient conclusion that the ending penalization has no place in civilized society . Two very undeniable and universal accompaniments override whole arguments in support of the death punishment the funda kind human right to life along with all its critical implications to the soulfulness and to society , and the irrevocability and finality of the death curse that takes away all probability of redemption or reconsideration at the boldness of the human nature to err is not a DeterrentThose who support the death punishment do so on the hind end of the belief that it acts as a watertight deterrent to crimes homogeneous to those committed by the condemned . The facts and figures , however , tell a unlike story . In the United States , the south accounts for 80 of the executions , nonetheless it has the highest murder rate . However , the northeast which has less than 1 of all executions , also has the lowest murder rate ( Information Centre . The figures lend themselves to very straight forward interpretations : both the death penalisation is failing miserably to act as a deterrent in the south or it has to be accepted that the citizenry of the south is inherently ofttimes murderous in nature or is s think of more than suasible to murder . There are other figures that corroborate the fact that the death punishment does not actually result in a decrease in murder rates . In Canada , the death penalization was abolished in 1976 . The homicide rate in the republic started declining since 1975 , and in 1999 the homicide rate was the lowest since 1967 . An analysis by the brisk York Times in 2000 put up that the homicide rates in the US states with the death penalty have been 48 to 101 high than in states without the death penalty ( pot Howard Society of Ontario 2001An overwhelming 84 of the top criminologists of the United States have rejected the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder (Radelet Akers . The pardon planetary has also failed to find conclusive evidence that the death penalty has any unique capacity to deter others from committing resembling crimes . In its survey of research findings on the relation between the death penalty and homicide rates conducted in 1998 and updated in 2002 , it cerebrate that it was not prudent to accept the hypothesis that corking penalisation deters murder to a marginally greater extent than does the scourge and application of the supposedly lesser punishment of life bondage (Hood , 2002 pp . 230If deterrence implies that the condemned is rendered unable to repeat the crime and claim more victim , then it leave alone also have to imply that the condemned would have repeated the crime if allowed to escape the death penalty . That can however be an assumption and an assumption only And even if we assume that the condemned someone would have indeed seek to repeat the crime , it would be possible only if the person is allowed the liberty and the opportunity to do so . Life bonds without parole would be a substitute to the death penalty in such a courtship . Critics would however be quick to point out the financial implications of life chainsIrreversibility of the The inalienable weakness of the death penalty as a justifiable measure lies in the fact that it is irreversible and irrevocable . numerous examples bear testimony to the fact that even the highest judicial ashes of any country can make mistakes , that exonerated persons have been dealt the death penalty time and again , that persons on the death row had been give wayed last minute reprieve when their purity had been provedStudies reveal that more than 200 people have been wrongfully convicted of serious crimes such as murder and rape in California alone since 1989 (Martin . In the United States 123 persons have been judge and released from death row since 1973 ( Information Center 2006 . A eighties study in the United States identified 353 brasss since the turn of the atomic number 6 of wrongful convictions for offences punishable by death and 25 innocent persons were actually setd (John Howard Society of Ontario , 2001The death penalty leaves no scope for errors in judgment . If a person is raise to be innocent after the sentence has been carried out , in that location is no way in which the wrong can be undone . Unlike in other boldnesss , the option for salary for a wrong done is also completely command out in the case of the death penaltyA Cost in addition highIn practice , however , numerous studies have found that the court of implementing a death penalty is more higher than the bell of maintaining a prisoner for life . There are umpteen reasons why the death penalty is more expensive than life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (Capital Punishment propose , 2003A much higher percentage of cases go to essay in case of death penaltiesMurder runnings generally take longer when the death penalty is at issue A hood murder trial lasts over 3 .5 time longer than non-capital murder trials (Cook Slawson . definite constitutional safeguards have to be taken in the case of death penalty trials leading to greater time extremity . The Jury selection procedure is also more mazy and tedious and takes more timeDeath penalty trials require more intense pretrial preparations and more elaborate proceedings . The sentencing phase closely amounts to a second trial . All litigation cost , more a good deal than not , have to be borne by the tax payerIt is thusly amply clear the life imprisonment without parole is a comparatively cheaper and equally effective alternative to the death penalty , that imposed the same stop of incapacitation on the condemned on the individual level benevolent Rights InfringementThe most damning case against the death penalty is that it is an infringement on the most fundamental of all human rights - the right to life . A death penalty is imposed in the name of the state . further does the state actually have the right to deprive a person of his or her life ? It could be a chancy proposition even to believe so . Hitler s Ger some believed in the dictatorial right of the state . The consequences mark a very heavy period in the history of humankind . Are we alluring fate again by according the state the right to impose and execute the death penaltyIn the December 1948 Universal contract bridge of Human Rights , nations of the world came together to ensure the fundamental rights of both person . These human rights were not subject to the will of the state but were declared to be inherent in every human creation . It was not the state s prerogative to grant or withdraw the human rights . The fundamental human rights therefore put limitations on what a state may do to a person . The Universal declaration recognizes each person s right to life . The death penalty is therefore a fragrant violation of human rights . Human rights preserve the self-respect of the individual . There can be no apology barbaric and cruel treatment and punishment that degrades the essence of beneficence . The death penalty inflicts the most severe kind of mental and physical torture not only on the condemned but also on al those who are related to the condemned . every member of the society also has to own responsibility as a constituent unit of the stateThe Principle of lex talionisProponents of the death penalty attempt to loose their stand on the principle of lex talionis or `eye-for-an-eye which advocates that violence must in some measure be answered by violence or that the punishment should fit the crime . They believe that such retribution serves justice to murder victims and their survivorsJust as the individual do not have the right to gobble up , society also should not be empowered to bolt worst . The retribution theory would dictate that the rapist be ravish and the house of the arsonist be set on fireSuch a policy would go against the basic tenets of justice . If violence can be justified by violence than it follows that every act of violence whether perpetuated by the state or the individual would be justifiable on some ground or the other . Retribution in kind would bring the state down to the level of the criminal . There would then be no distinction between the dispenser of the law and the one who violates itMisuse of the Misuse of the death penalty is another reason that calls for its abolition . In the political context , the death penalty has often been used to eliminate opponents and suppress popular uprisings . Here , the question of fairness in making the judgment becomes a very subjective one .

What is punishable by death for one political regimen could very well be deemed a heroic act of valor for another . The labeling of the act therefore depends very much on the actors and the circumstances and the environment in which they operate . That is the reason why people who are executed are often subsequently turned into martyrs . It happened in Hitler s Germany , in India and in sulfur Africa . It is happening in Iraq in Afghanistan , in Serbia and in many other places wherever two groups of people look at the world with conflicting perspectivesTake the example of ibn Talal Hussein Hussien . Richard Dicker s , music director of Human Rights Watch s internationalist Justice Program , was a rational voice when he said , Saddam ibn Talal ibn Talal Hussein was responsible for massive human rights violations , but that can t justify giving him the death penalty , which is a cruel and inhuman punishment (Human Rights Watch , 2006 ) A November 2006 report by Human Rights Watch pointed out numerous serious flaws in the trial of Saddam Hussein . Among other defects , the report found that Iraqi government actions had all along undermined the Iraqi High judicatory and threatened its independence and perceived impartiality . Handing Saddam Hussein the death penalty has been viewed by a large character of the world as a measure made inevitable by the prevailing political and military situation rather than a quest for justiceThere is also a very strong view in the United States that the application of the death sentence is racially discriminatoryStudies have been conducted to examine the relationship between quicken and death penalty in all the states that where the death penalty is still active . The Capital Punishment Project (2007 ) reports that 96 studies found a pattern of either race-of-victim or race-of-defendant difference . Of those executed since 1976 , approximately 35 have been black , even though blacks constitute only 12 of the population . It has been found that the odds of receiving a death sentence are almost four times higher if the defendant is blackThe Amnesty International (2003 ) has also asserted that races does have an impact on capital punishment , and that the judicial system of the United States have been able to do precious little about it . Amnesty International has attributed this failure of the courts and legislatures of the USA to act decisively at the hardiness of evidence that race has an impact on the death sentence to a collective `blind faith that America will never waver on the `non-negotiable demands of human dignity including `equal justiceThe Larger World ViewThe good news is that the world at large is coming together to prove that the death penalty is an unacceptable proposition . The United Nations has declared itself in party favour of abolition . Two-thirds of the countries of the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or in practice . In the United States itself , 13 states are now without the death penalty . The latest information from Amnesty International shows thatNinety countries and territories have abolished the death penalty for all crimes11 countries have abolished the death penalty for all but exceptional crimes such as wartime crimes30 countries can be considered abolitionist in practice : they retain the death penalty in law but have not carried out any executions for the past 10 years or more and are believed to have a policy or realized practice of not carrying out executionsa practiceSixty-six other countries and territories retain and use the death penalty , but the number of countries which actually execute prisoners in any one year is much smallerThe make do over capital punishment has raged on long complete . The world is finally showing the door to the death penalty . In doing so , it is stating in no uncertain impairment that the sanctity of life of a fellow human being is above the purview of all man-made laws . That only the donor of life has the right to take it backReferencesAmnesty International , 2003 , United States of AmericaDeath by discrimination - the continuing role of race in capital cases .Library , Online Documentation Archive . [Online] operable . [February 28 2008]Capital Punishment Project , 2007 , Race and the , American cultured Liberties Union , [Online] Available [February 28 , 2008]Capital Punishment Project , 2003 , The High Costs of the American Civil Liberties Union Information Center , 2006 , Innocence and the [Online] Available [February 28 , 2008] Information Centre , 2007 , Facts about the [Online] Available [February 28 , 2008]Hood , R , 2002 , The : A World-wide Perspective . Oxford Clarendon Press , third editionHuman Rights Watch , 2006 , Iraq : Saddam Hussein put to Death . Hanging after flaw trial undermines the rule of law . Human Rights News [Online] Available [February 28 2008]John Howard Society of Ontario , 2001 , The : Any Nation s Shame , John Howard Society of Ontario publication . [Online] Available [February 28 , 2008]Cook ,, J Slawson , D , B , 1993 , The Costs of Prosecuting Murder Cases in North Carolina page 2 ...If you want to get a full essay, site it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .