Ban of Same Sex Marriage

This argument was countered by the opposition, who argued that an amendment was not necessary because the state already had a law illegalise same-sex marriage. The opposition worried that the amendment's wording was too vague, possibly conduct to future problems for couples, both gay and straight, who are bound in a civil union instead of a marriage.

societal conservatives were extremely succ

ssful at get out the vote after spending millions of dollars on their right to vote drive for the amendment.

The opposition was also well funded; it portrayed the amendment as overacted unneeded, and claimed that it could cause problems with partner benefits for straight couples who were not married, as well. twain sides spent over 5 million dollars on advertisement their position on television and the radio.

The opposition campaign, called SayNo2, was headed by Michael Kenny, who say during the entire election season that he thought th
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.