predicament? investigate journalist Valerie E. lee(prenominal) and David T. Burkam comp ard
students who dropped out versus students who did not (p. 354). Journalist Lee and
David grouped danger factors into three categories:
A. Social mise en scene (e.g., ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, family
structure, inner-city residence).
B. Academic background (e.g., ability, test scores, grade repeating history).
C. Academically related behaviors (e.g., troth with direct, school grades,
truancy, disciplinary encounters).
When researchers frame dropping out as a function of student background and behavior,
the implication is that students themselves are at fault for taking such unwise actions
(Lee and Burkam). The students are blamed for making the misguided decision of
dropping out. other students who share these characteristics are at risk of dropping out.
What affects does this affirm on the student?
The social background of a student partakes a specific role in high school
dropouts. A student suffering from poor grades tend to gear up a lack of self-worth,
which lends a student to dropping out.
Research suggest that poor performances in
school either like a shot harm a students self-perceptions or lead to disidentify from
academic in order to protect or support the students perception of self-worth and value
(Griffin). For ex axerophtholle, Black and Hispanic students systematically demonstrate levels of
academic achievement below White students(Demo & angstrom; Parker, 1987; Miller, 1995;
Simmons, Brown, Bush, & Blyth, 1978; Steele, 1992, 1997) (Griffin), yet Black and
Hispanic students have levels of spherical self-esteem and self-concept that are equal to or
exceed those of Whites (Cooper & Dorr, 1995; Crocker & Major, 1989; Dukes &
Martinez, 1994; Graham, 1994; Jensen, White &...If you want to nark a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.